Censorship on S&M

topic posted Thu, December 8, 2005 - 5:45 AM by  Lynne
I have received info that the states are really coming down heavy on torture/S&M activities. Have any of you got any first hand info on what is happening? I realise that Bush has set up a team to thwart torture sites.....any more info than that?
posted by:
Lynne
United Kingdom
  • Re: Censorship on S&M

    Sun, December 11, 2005 - 12:41 PM
    Are you talking if the military does it or you do it in your own home?
    • Re: Censorship on S&M

      Mon, December 12, 2005 - 1:07 AM
      Own home:

      censorship of S+M
      Message FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

      National Coalition for Sexual Freedom

      Contact:
      Susan Wright, NCSF Spokesperson
      (917) 848-6544

      Wave of Obscenity Prosecutions Leads to Closure and Self-Censorship of SM Websites

      October 20, 2005 - Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has announced that his office will specifically target "bestiality, urination, defecation, as well as sadistic and masochistic behavior" in pursuing new obscenity prosecutions. The Department of Justice began recruiting in late July for a new anti-obscenity squad to pursue obscenity prosecutions, and the FBI announced in September that it was forming an anti-obscenity task force to crack down on pornography.

      Any website that has content containing "bestiality, urination, defecation, as well as sadistic and masochistic behavior" should be forewarned that prosecution is possible. Additionally, Federal sentencing guidelines state that any obscenity-related punishment should be "enhanced for sadomasochistic material."

      Forty people and businesses have been convicted of obscenity since 2001, and 20 additional indictments are pending according to Andrew Oosterbaan, chief of the Justice Department's child exploitation and obscenity section. There were only four obscenity prosecutions during the eight years of the Clinton administration.

      Though adult content is, in theory, protected by the First Amendment, only a jury can determine if a work is obscene or not under the subjective set of standards that vary from one community to the next established in the 1973 Supreme Court ruling, Miller v. California.

      Text is not inherently more protected than images when it comes to obscenity charges. The erotic fiction website Red Rose Stories is facing obscenity charges after federal agents raided the owner's home on October 3rd, taking computer equipment and diskettes that contained all of their files and site information.

      The Department of Justice is clearly hoping that websites will self-censor or remove their content entirely. Midori, a fetish model and SM educator who teaches classes on bondage, has removed her website, BeautyBound.com, citing fear of obscenity prosecution. The owner of three SM websites, known as GrandPa DeSade, removed his websites from the Internet. SuicideGirls.com also announced they are self-censoring their materials over concerns about a possible obscenity crackdown.

      Recent prosecutions of obscenity on websites include: A former police officer in Lakeland, Florida, was arrested on October 7th on over 300 obscenity-related charges for the sexual content posted on his website. The same day, webmaster Chris Wilson, owner of amateur website NowThatsFuckedUp.com, was raided on charges of obscenity by a local Sheriff's office.

      "I think it's crucial for us to stand up for consensual sadomasochism and other alternative sexual practices," says Barbara Nitke, fetish photographer. "This is a battle worth fighting, and I hope everyone who can will just censor out the most provocative material from their websites, but keep them up. I also appeal to the lawyers in our community to help us find ways to keep people's websites up."

      Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) have proactively challenged federal obscenity laws as applied to the Internet, arguing that obscenity laws based on "local community standards" are too vague and their existence burdens protected speech, resulting in self-censorship due to the fear of prosecution. A district court three-judge panel in New York ruled that while Nitke and the NCSF members were at risk, more proof was needed that obscenity laws cause otherwise protected speech to be restrained through acts of self-censorship. The case is currently on appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

      "The effect of silencing alternative lifestyle speech was exactly why we brought the lawsuit," says attorney John Wirenius, lead counsel for NCSF. "The self-censorship we are seeing underscores the importance of supporting our ongoing obscenity challenge."

      To contribute to the appeal of the CDA lawsuit, go to:

      www.ncsfreedom.org/donations.htm

      National Coalition for Sexual Freedom - www.ncsfreedom.org
      Barbara Nitke - www.barbaranitke.com

      ###

      A project of NCSF

      The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom is a national organization committed to creating a political, legal, and social environment in the United States that advances equal rights of consenting adults who practice forms of alternative sexual expression. NCSF is primarily focused on the rights of consenting adults in the SM-leather-fetish, swing, and polyamory communities, who often face discrimination because of their sexual expression.

      National Coalition for Sexual Freedom
      822 Guilford Avenue, Box 127
      Baltimore, MD 21202-3707
      410-539-4824
      media@ncsfreedom.org
      www.ncsfreedom.org


      Please Cross Post
  • Re: Censorship on S&M

    Mon, December 19, 2005 - 1:03 PM
    The Bush people first set up an initial force in July of this year to start training to prosecute cases involving BDSD and S&M. These two areas of sexual encounter were singled out as especially offensive to the God fearing Christians of "our great land." There have been a number of events not to receive wide public attention.

    Quite frankly, I would not be surprised if I were not arrested myself for defending sexual freedom and revision of many silly laws from another century.

    There is a limit to what I can - or will - publish here. I am fairly new to Tribe and enjoy the site very much. It is a delight! I hope the censorship will permit the private controls of an individual site to ease the concerns of the legal counsel of the corporate owner of Tribe.

    Your general remark of "Bush has set up a team to thwart torture sites" is quite true. The White House will lie (so, what else is new?) and deny many things, but these attack on sexual site has been a "go" since July.

    The Attorney General must make a name for himself in this error of horrible acts by Bush, et al. The AG can obtain great publicity and support from the religious right who speak directly to God daily. I have do doubt that the AG wil attack.

    One can compare this Bushland/Jesusland era with the Chinese "Cultural Revolution" in some ways.

    David
    • Re: Censorship on S&M

      Thu, December 22, 2005 - 3:55 AM
      I don`t want to sound a scare-monger but....this also has the hidden veil of america not being a democracy at all, but a tyrant leader who appeals to the wealthy & religios at first, then strikes when the majority are in its grasp!
      There has been no mention about this on any international news network that I am aware of & certainly no news in UK here.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Censorship on S&M

        Thu, December 22, 2005 - 1:25 PM
        I STILL say this is the first step to the US putting queers (you other freaks just get lumped into our shit on this) on the trains.

        The wording in this new bill is only missing the word homosexual, and it could sound like any sermon given by a televangetard.
      • Re: Censorship on S&M

        Thu, January 26, 2006 - 7:31 PM
        Hello all, I'm quite new to tribes, in fact this is my first post...

        I have been doing a documentary on BDSM for the last two years and so I have become intimately acquainted with the laws on this topic and their impact. It is rather insidious. They have taken the child-pornography panic and used it to pry open the doors and launch an all out attack on all sexual material (particularly harsh on SM).

        And at no point do they say "You cannot post pornography." Instead what they do is make it practically impossible to comply with legal standards (through extraordinary record keeping requirements) and add extremely heavy penalties for non-compliance. They (the rulers and demagogues) are getting smarter in thier tactics and that is making them both more successful and more dangerous.

        I have encountered many people who've been forced to abandon high quality and very artistic websites purely out of fear. Fear inspired by the people most responsible for "defending our rights." It's not like we have seen this administration showing any legal restraint on other fronts either.

        It's a sad comment. And there seems to be little opposing them outside of NCSF. I did my little documentary with a very honest and positive take on the community. I feel this is the best I can do to reverse the trend. If we don't see examples of media moving the other way, then the conservative religious right will have all the momentum. And unfortunately I fear they are gaining greater traction than they have ever had before.

        HSW

Recent topics in "! 1 MARQUIS DE SADE blackviolin.com"